Video games on the other hand generate frames in real time, so whilst v-sync can improve the output of these frames it can lead to what is known as вЂњinput lagвЂќ. When watching a video which has a fixed number of frames you might find frames are dropped resulting in a juddering effect. If youвЂ™ve ever used V-Sync you might have well have noticed the accompanying input lag associated with this solution. It solves tearing but at the cost of both latency and fixed refresh cycles (30,60,90,120). This is different from adaptive sync in that it is still the monitor that drives the process. This visual synchronisation, or V-sync, stops the graphics card from doing anything until the monitor completes itвЂ™s refresh. There is already an existing solution to this problem and you may have already seen this option in games that you own. The monitor attempts to output part of one frame at the top and part of another at the bottom and of course you get a miss-match part way through the screen.ДЄdaptive sync attempts to solve this problem by getting the graphics card to drive the process, this ensures the monitor adapts to stay in sync with the GPUвЂ™s ability to draw frames. For example, a 60Hz monitor will try to refresh the screen 60 times in one second so to do that it needs to get 60 frames from the graphics card. The tearing occurs when your graphics card canвЂ™t keep up with the monitor. But once you become aware of it this affect can really detract from your experience. Many gamers donвЂ™t even notice it, or at least tolerate it.

If youвЂ™ve ever noticed your image not quite lining up, especially during busy parts of a game, you are experiencing screen tearing. If youвЂ™ve every experienced choppy images, stutters and odd visual affects it could be due problems with your graphics card keeping in sync with your monitor. They offer a real solution to a real problem that has been plaguing many monitor owners. In brief, I really liked Aptik ease of use and performance, I'd say is quite a very good alternative when it comes to backing up your data.Adaptive sync technologies like G-Sync and FreeSyncВ have become a big dealВ in graphics and monitor technology. I will try it again after reading and/or watching any tutorials I find. Grsync wast fast and easy to set up, even though I kind of missed something and the backup didn't go as I expected. I also tried Grsync, a rsync GUI which also features the ability to save to an external drive and you can run a simulation before the real deal, so you can check everything will be fine before proceeding with the backup process. Back in time looked nice but I found it kind of confusing always complaining about something I can't remember now. I'm not able to do this with systemback, maybe I'm missing something not sure, is it possible? I also tried Timeshift but it takes way too much space on the HDD, I know data can be excluded but I'd prefer not to mess with that but rather that the backup program handles it by itself. The feature I like the most is the fact that I can save to an external drive, which if you ask me makes more sense than saving to the same drive the backed up OS is in.

I don't know if this qualifies as an alternative to systemback, but I just reinstalled LL and used Aptik to restore all of my settings and most of my data pretty fast and very easy to use.

Aptik vs grsync